Hvorfor islam vil seire, eller "vi" tape?

 

(Det kommer en oppfølger til følgende postering i «neste nummer»):

Har du noen gang vært nedsettende – eller nedlatende eller kanskje: Paternaliserende og forkleinende?

Ja vel.

Se for deg folkehavet – av troende – på St. Peters-plassen og hvor paven står på balkongen og formaner:

 

-Du skal ikke si muhammedaner eller muhammedanisme … du skal ikke si «jhadist» etc. Verboten

 

Og hele forsamlingen – og hvor noen sukker og gråter høylytt - bøyer hodet og sier: Ja og Amen.

 

Er paven nedsettende eller nedlatende? Han fortsetter:

 

-Dere skal si: Vi er kristne … eller f eks buddhister …

 

Hele folket løfter hodene, retter pekefingeren mot himmelen og sier: Nei, nei, nei … Amen. Som svar på begge påbud?

 

Bispekollegiet i Norge: Kristensionismen må fordømmes … Kristen Red Selbekk: Jeg er sionist og er stolt av det …

 

Og se nå for deg hele Europa, hele Britain, hele USA … man følger opp, massene bøye seg og føler seg plutselig litt bedre, - litt mer servilt betinget emosjonelt korrekte. Alle sammen, i en haug. Flere og fler bøyer seg og blir incells – «frivillig» sosialt kastrerte eller tvangsnevrotisk sølibatære. Det blir stadig færre barn blant oss, samtidig som hele samfunnet kollektivt bare blir mer og mer barnslig. Vi forstår ikke at et barn som ikke blir født, er et barn tapt. Vi foretrekker visst det kollektive selvmord.  The Strange Death of … se Murray:

http://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2021/07/eurabia-murray-hrs-og-jakten-pa-p.html

http://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2022/05/nar-putin-taper-vil-ogsa-islam-tape.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/01/selbekk-bondevik-stre-og-stoltenberg.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2022/06/the-war-on-west-douglas-murray.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2022/10/islam-i-fare-for-bli-fordmt-av-norsk.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2012/03/den-muslimske-terroristen-psykotisk.html

 

Var Stanghelle bare et dilemma, et personlig paradoks uten forløsningspotensiale og derfor destruktiv i sitt «principum»?:

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2012/06/stanghelles-paradoks.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2019/05/johanes-morkens-paskebudskap-den.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2015/03/norsk-occidentialisme-et-skuebrd-og-et.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2020/11/salsal-na-en-muslimsk-islamkritiker-ser.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2010/12/fremtidens-terror-i-norge.html

 

Ok, dette kan misforstås, og snus og vendes på, tenk litt over det, så ser du det. Ah, det var altså bare en lek med ord, lingvistikk, retorikk, pytt, pytt … ? Men metafysikk? Slaveriet under de påtatte emosjoner?

 

Men se: Muslimer verden over sier taktfast, legger seg på sin matte, hvis tidspunktet passer, og sier: Ja, ja, ja … endelig, de har forstått det nå … respetta … cudos … macho?

Noe som ikke stemmer her, noe urovekkende i dette?

Jeg er litt skamfull nå, over meg selv. Jeg fikk en deja vy. For noen år siden stilte jeg meg selv spørsmålet: Hvorfor har vi sluttet å si «muhammedaner» og «muhammedanisme!? Hva hadde jeg gått glip av, var jeg begynt å bli nedsettende nå? I så fall, beklager, jeg har mistet min verdighet, min identitet, jeg har ikke klart å tilpasse med … jeg vil ikke være nedlatende, det lønner seg ikke sosialt …

Måtte Gud forby slike tanker?

Svaret ga seg selv: Jo, fordi vi allerede har underkastet oss, uten helt å forstå og vite hvorfor vi har gjort det. For det er faktum at vi har gjort, gjort det selv, på sublimt grunnlag, subliminalt nivå, en skummel prosess, - imperativet er jo fremdeles: Våg å tenke selv, semper aude. Semper ferenda? (Ecclesia semper reformanda est?).  

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2020/10/min-kjledegge-i-dagen-no-hard-feelings.html

Og:

Esam Omeish:

Enhver som bruker de følgende termer, uttrykker islamofobi:

Islamsk terror

Islamistisk terror

Jihadist

Voldelig jihad/jihadisme

Muslimsk terrorist

Islamistisk ekstremist

Islam er ikke en religion

Islam hater oss

Radikal islam

Forby shharia lov

Sharia er uforenlig med Den amerikanske konstitusjon

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2019/04/ekstremistiske-handlinger-erna-solberg.html

Skal vi være i evig forandring fordi forandring er progresjon, ja, fremskritt, ja, revolusjon, nødvendig revolusjon, åndelig eller sjelisk revolusjon, eller materialistisk eller kroppslig revolusjon, strukturell og dialektisk-ideologisk basert revolusjon, - silkehansker og silkerevolusjon fra barrikadene? Kan det være mulig? Ja, ifølge en aktør, en kommentator, som blir mye ignorert i Skandinavia, han mener vi har gjort det på kommando. Vi er kanskje den mest ubevisste og minst selvbevisste og aller minste politisk og ideologisk bevisste kultur i verdenshistorien, den kulturen som hatet seg selv mest og som derfor gikk til grunne fortest. (I skrivende stund hører jeg på radio at en gjeng «palestina-amorøse» har omringet en bygning der FrP skulle holde et viktig møte og hvor ingen kommer inn og ingen kommer ut av bygningen – hva i all verden, Israel bomber en bit Iran?).

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2021/06/den-nye-private-overguden-det-har.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2022/08/undergraver-religionsfriheten.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/02/er-staten-norge-autoritr-totalitr-og.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2023/07/vi-har-allerede-glemt-det-paris.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2023/08/andrew-tate-sinead-oconnor-og-sure-2-et.html

 

Merete Hodne er en person jeg beundret, men som mange totalneglisjerte, dessverre, da det sto på. Hun er eller var en flott, fjong, våken og frimodig, og uredd for kontakt med sitt eget, indre, selvstendige jeg, en dame-frisør flink i faget  – husker? Hun sto rakt i stormen. Det kan ha kostet henne mye. Bygdedyret, du vet for å eufemisere litt. Eller embellishere … Hun var visst medlem av SIAN, også. Det utnyttet forkleiner-tilbøyelige til fulle. Schadenfreudergriskt.

Hun ble nedsettende beskrevet av tidl. journalist Jon Hustad i et debattprogram på tv. Og jeg så at han ikke helt forsto at hun kanskje var viktigere og sannere og bedre sende enn han. Hun deltok ikke selv i akkurat i denne sendingen, men i en annen litt aparte sendingen brukte hun ordene muhammedanisme og muhammedaner, i en slags realistisk og mild og helt uskyldig eufori-rus, uten hat i stemmen, uten en dirrende pekefinger. Det skulle hun ikke gjort, altså, ifølge «etablissementet». Se over.

Hun ble omtrent samtidig kalt «nazifrisør» av en proff humorist med en IQ på 110, etter eget sigende, i en sang eller vise som «alle hørte». «De vise» her, ble ikke dømt for ærekrenkelse. Du verden så vise vi er … de var og er selvsagt servilt betinget emosjonelt korrekte, til neglespissene og trives veldig godt med det, - underdanighet under hva? Paven?

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/11/hodne-saken-er-islam-et-politisk-parti.html

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/10/hodne-saken-er-islam-en-religion.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/09/hodne-marcuse-og-fugelli.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/09/straff-for-hijab-nekt-betyr-kt.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/12/she-is-in-danger-she-is-not-dangerous.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2017/03/kulakk-moral-og-manglende-bevissthet-i.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/12/bertrand-russel-m-fl-parafrase-fiksjon.html

 

http://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2020/05/merete-hodne-vare-domtstoler-vare.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2016/10/det-privatrettslige-justismord.html

 

https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2020/05/merete-hodne-vare-domtstoler-vare.html

 

Et par photos som belegg:

 

Ser du komikken, ironien eller usikkerheten  og lidelsen i det? (Se også bilde nedert her).

https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/geir-lippestad-knallhardt-ut-mot-frp-under-mosk-debatt/s/12-95-3424175494

 

6. des 22: Jon Helgheim

sStorpdneo6ucdm8cs26m7m7e31mt1e cgau2uu63r009lie70h ub27g3.u  ·

I dag lanserte HL-Senteret en rapport om holdninger til muslimer og jøder. Rapporten er interessant på flere måter, men har også noen alvorlige feil og mangler.

Rapporten forsøker å kartlegge folks holdninger til muslimer og jøder og konkluderer blant annet med at FrPs velgere er mer islamfiendtlige enn andre. For å komme frem til dette har de bedt respondentene om å ta stilling til en rekke påstander om muslimer. Dersom du sier deg helt enig i to av påstandene eller delvis enig i fire på delen som handler om fordommer, da har du fordommer som igjen kan kvalifisere til å bli islamfiendtlig.

Jeg har sett påstandene og kunne sagt meg enig nesten alle, helt uten at det finnes grunnlag for å si jeg har fordommer eller kalle meg islamfiendtlig.

Dersom man for eksempel mener muslimer føler seg moralsk overlegne andre og begår mer voldskriminalitet, vil man i denne rapporten bli stemplet som en med høye fordommer. Eller for å si det på en annen måte - dersom man følger litt med og er ærlig, så vil man skåre høyt på fordommer. Undersøkelsen blir rett og slett en fordomsfelle der folk som er enig i faktiske realiteter vil fremstå som fordomsfulle.

Det finnes nemlig gode holdepunkter for å si at muslimer føler seg moralsk overlegne (de fleste religiøse gjør det) og det er utvilsomt slik at innvandrere fra muslimske land er grovt overrepresentert i kriminalitetstatistikken, spesielt voldskriminalitet.

Dermed ville en mye mer presis konklusjon være at FrPs velgere i større grad er enig i korrekte påstander om muslimer, ikke at de er fordomsfulle eller islamfiendtlige.

Rapporten har absolutt en verdi, men klassifiseringen og kategoriseringen er fullstendig misvisende og burde trekkes.

REDIGERING: Ved en feil ble det tidligere brukt eksempler på påstander som ikke alene inngikk i indeksen for muslimfientlighet. Påstandene inngår i indeksen for fordommer. Det gjaldt påstanden om at muslimer undertrykker kvinner. Jeg har nå byttet ut denne påstanden med påstanden om at muslimer ser på seg selv moralsk overlegne.

 

http://blogs.cbn.com/ibrahim/archive/2014/08/06/the-wests-prostration-to-islam.aspx

 

https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/14603/raymond-ibrahimqatar-published-fatwa-in-2006-permitting-burning-people-removes-it-after-is-burns-pilot/

 

https://internationalman.com/articles/authors/doug-casey

 

Se nå et kort utdrag av artikkelen jeg «teaset» med over:

https://internationalman.com/articles/why-islam-will-likely-win-its-forever-war-against-the-west/

 

Why Islam Will Likely Win Its Forever War Against the West, by Doug Casey

Let’s examine Islam and its impact on the West. …

Here’s the bottom line: the conflict between Islam and the West amounts to a Forever War …

… Why is that? Muslims see their lands and culture as having been under constant attack since the Crusades. …

Their personal foibles aside, Saddam Hussein and Moammar Khadafi are viewed as heroes by most Muslims for having fought against the Crusaders despite enormous odds.

… It completely dominates a huge part of the world with lots of poor people, little capital, little freedom, and uniformly repressive governments. To what degree is that the fault of Islam? I’d say to a large degree. But if that’s the case, how can the Mohammedans possibly win the Forever War? …

 

… Islam attracts people for very understandable reasons: It offers a neat package explaining the meaning of life while promising eternal bliss after death. It has some characteristics and makes promises, rendering it especially attractive to the poor and downtrodden, not least of which is a daily meal if you attend mosque and pray after performing your ablutions. And that means its potential market is about 75% of the world’s people.

The Essence of Islam

Islam has a number of sects, but only a tiny fraction as many as Christianity. …

… Islam offers benefits in the here and now, as well. It cultivates a brotherhood of believers cutting across racial, ethnic, and linguistic barriers not just in theory but in practice. It allows the believer to communicate directly with Allah, dispensing with an intermediary priesthood. Mullahs and imams are scholars or leaders; the position is open to anyone. It’s a very fraternal and democratic religion.

But it’s not a religion of peace, at least not until the world is Muslim. Muslims believe the world is divided into Darul Islam, the “House of Submission”—where infidels have been conquered or eliminated—and Darul Harb, the “House of War”—where war will establish Islam.

 

The word Islam means “submission.” Since Allah is all-powerful and all-knowing, it means that whatever happens is the will of Allah, and the faithful do well to accept it. This leads, on the one hand, to a mellow, destressifying view of life, which is a good thing. On the other hand, it can lead to a very fatalistic view of life, wherein hard work and striving can be pointless. This is one reason for the relative backwardness of the Muslim world. And the fact that many or most men are unemployed, especially those in Western countries.

 

It’s become the practice only in recent years to call the religion Islam. Mohammedanism used to be more common, and was accepted, the way followers of Christ are called Christians, and followers of Buddha are Buddhists. But it’s now PC to say Islam. Causing the West to replace its traditional word with one they prefer is itself a form of submission.

 

… the Muslims developed an excellent military organization enabled by religious fervor. Great conquests usually begin with a unifying ideology, most often some form of nationalism or religion, and the simpler and more certain, the better. That’s exactly what Islam gave the Arabs; they had Allah on their side. The conquests led to wealth, and wealth to civilization and progress.

… Conquered dhimmis meant wealth and leisure.

… The higher the technological level of a society, the less sense theft makes. The whole story of civilization is one of replacing theft by production. In a high-tech world, theft is actually counterproductive, much as you gain no knowledge by stealing the answers to a test. That’s not the way it was in the ancient world, however, when Allah dictated the immutable Koran.

Conquest allowed the Muslims, tent dwellers riding out of the desert, to become wealthy and stay wealthy for a while. But—notwithstanding the Golden Age, when there were lots of dhimmis to provide them leisure—Muslims are suspicious of secular knowledge. Since the Koran is the exact and indisputable word of Allah, it’s almost blasphemy to read anything else, learn about anything else, or do anything that doesn’t relate directly to what Allah wants you to do. A good Muslim makes his religion not just the centerpiece of his life; he makes it his life. This is why many Muslims know little other than what they learn in Madrassa or lectures from their mullah.

 

… That’s not to say Islam doesn’t share many Western moral values. …

Fundamentalism

What should really concern people in the West, however, aren’t the economic but the political ramifications of Mohammed’s religion. While many other religions, from Voodoo to Hinduism, may be viewed as quaint or bizarre, Islam is a threat. That’s because of what is considered the 6th Pillar, known as Jihad, or Holy War, to defend and spread Islam.

… Fundamentalism amounts to living your life exactly according to The Book, at least as you understand it. … They don’t just talk the talk; they walk the walk. But fundamentalism is only a short step from fanaticism.

The Future of Islam

… The Ummah will fight not so much with planes and tanks, but with weapons they can afford, which are ironically not just vastly cheaper but vastly more cost-effective. Among other things, they’ll use demographics and waves of migrants. Their large families are paid for by host countries. We won’t call their warriors “soldiers” or “terrorists” but “neighbors.”

One of Islam’s greatest strengths is also one of its greatest weaknesses: namely, the fact it’s more than a religion; it’s a complete worldview. …

Some, especially those in National Security circles, discreetly ask what should be done about the Muslim threat. My answer is: This is not a military problem and can’t be solved with military solutions. …

Wokeism can be loosely defined by degraded concepts like intersectionality, LGBTQ, DEI, safe spaces, widespread triggering, shameless pandering to minorities, identity politics, guilt about the values of the West, and a desire to abolish traditional norms and culture. And something called Islamophobia—it’s as if the West is supposed to welcome Islam. When, in fact, Islam is as pernicious as Nazism or Communism.

The Ummah of Muslims suffers from none of this. …

… There are Muslim technicians who can learn by rote. But very few Muslim scientists because science requires independent thought. Almost all Muslim scientists, not coincidentally, live in the West. Islam can’t keep up except through force.

 

The economic future of countries with Islamic traditions will not be what it could be. …

… Islam is more than a religion to its 2 billion believers; it’s a worldview. It necessarily intrudes into all aspects of life—business, family, law, government—you name it. The Koran is largely written in the first person as the direct and incontrovertible word of Allah Himself. As the newest Abrahamic religion, Islam is at the same stage of development as Christianity was at the same age. It has a medieval outlook. Will it mellow? I doubt it. It would no longer be Islam if the Koran and Hadith are not strictly observed.

… The high and continuing immigration from Africa and Asia, compounded by a very high Muslim birthrate and a lower-than-replacement native birthrate, augurs poorly for the West. Estimates vary, but the Pew Research project, done in 2013, projected that by 2050, Muslims would make up over 30% of Sweden, 20% of Germany and Austria, and 15-18% of most other Western European countries.

 

Many factors could alter these demographics, but Mohammedans are already close to a majority in many major cities, including London and Paris. And major cities are where policy is made. Immigration is rising rapidly, not least because the EU essentially legislates the welcoming of “refugees.” They’re to be given free room, board, income, and a cell phone upon arrival, and in most cases, a hearing on their status doesn’t take place for many months. The only thing most Muslim countries produce is more Muslims. So-called refugees will play a significant part in winning the war against Darul Harb and the kaffirs in Europe.

 

In addition, there’s a growing trend for conversion in the West, evidenced by Andrew Tate—not someone I follow but he ranked #1 in Internet hits in 2022. It’s a trend among many black athletes, in particular Mike Tyson.

The Forever War won’t be fought with conventional armies, not just because the Islamic world doesn’t have the technology. But because Western militaries are useless against an amorphous mass of millions of people. …

So, what will the conflict be like? Amorphous and disjointed, chaotic and without fixed fronts. With many millions of Muslims in Europe—Pakistanis in the UK, Turks in Germany, North Africans in France, and Holland—Europe’s conquest of the world has come back to bite it. …

Many think that the US can’t lose a war because of its extremely high-tech military. Expensive toys can be useful from time to time; they can win some battles. But they’re basically useless for winning the next generation of warfare, like cavalry in WW1 or battleships in WW2. There may be a few aircraft carriers and F-35s around in 20 years. But they’ll be oddities reserved for special purposes, like typewriters. …

 

-