Vi legger nå ut utdrag av tre høyaktuelle artikler som er ment å supplere følgende posteringer.
(Det handler om ICC/ICJ, om hvorvidt Islam nå er i ferd med
å etablere seg som ett parti i Europa og om Israels generelle stiling innen
folkeretten).
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/barth-eide-det-perfekte-tidspunkt.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/nrk-og-domstolen-i-haag-like-begredelige.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/4-mill-i-england-na-skjer-overtakelsen.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/det-oppsiktsvkkende-blir-galdelig.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/biden-sykere-enn-han-tror-tror-at.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/katie-hopkins-islam-party.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/hvem-kan-tenkes-si-allah-er.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/gaza-hva-som-star-pa-spill-om-en.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2012/01/okkupasjonen-av-spania-andalusia-er-en.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/03/okkupasjonen-lovlig-og-ikke-ulovlig.html
Om forholdene i Tyskland i dag: Vi ser tendensen til at
det vil skje som vi har påstått i mange år nå, at Islam faktisk allerede er ett
parti i Europa:
…
More than a
thousand Islamic extremists recently marched through the streets of Hamburg,
Germany’s second-largest city, demanding that the European Union’s most
populous and powerful country be reconstituted as an Islamic state governed by
sharia. The demonstration, organized by a fast-growing Islamist group called Muslim Interaktiv, was allowed to proceed after
left-wing parties in Hamburg’s legislature rejected a petition by right-wing parties to prohibit
the event.
During the
April 27 march in Hamburg’s multicultural Sankt
Georg district, the Islamists — mostly young men, but also women in chadors,
hijabs, niqabs, and jilbabs — complained about an alleged surge in
“Islamophobia” in Germany since October 7, when Hamas terrorists
slaughtered more than 1,000 Israelis.
Amid
shouts of “Allahu Akbar” and
“There is no God but Allah,” the protesters reminded German authorities of their constitutional
obligation to ensure justice for everyone. They then described
Germany as a “dictatorship of values” and called for replacing it with a
caliphate, an Islamic dictatorship in which there is no separation between
state and religion.
… On the one hand, the German government continues to trivialize and even express solidarity with the totalitarian challenge to democracy posed by radical Muslims, who openly seek to
overturn Germany’s constitutional order; on the other, the government is obsessed with the threats it says are posed to democracy by the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD), the country’s second-largest political party, whose popularity is largely fueled by voters frustrated with the government’s refusal to crack down on those very same Islamists.
The German government’s laissez-faire approach to Islamism has moved the problem into a taboo zone that has strengthened the Islamists. Some observers argue that if the German government would only take the Islamist threat more seriously, it could instantly solve the populist problem by removing the main issue that makes the AfD so popular.
But alas, key members of Germany’s government — and, apparently, many German voters — are disciples of wokeism, which claims that Islamists are a disadvantaged minority group that must be empowered. At the same time, Germans seeking to preserve their culture against the encroachment of Islamism are branded as right-wing extremists who pose an existential danger to democracy.
After the Hamburg imbroglio, Interior Minister Nancy Faeser declared: “If you want a caliphate, you’ve come to the wrong place.” And yet, just a few weeks earlier, she’d insisted that the real danger to Germany lies not with the Islamists but with the far right. When asked why she considers right-wing extremism to be more threatening than Islamism, she replied: “Islamism does not want to overthrow the system, right-wing extremists do.”
… Muslim Interaktiv, along with its
close cousins, Generation Islam and Realität Islam, is the vanguard of a new generation of German
Islamists who have replaced old-school jihadist propaganda with the fresh
battle cry of grievance peddling. While the overall goal — to Islamize Western
society — remains the same, the new method of adopting the role of an aggrieved
minority is more effective because, rather than being overtly illegal, such
speech is constitutionally protected.
Muslim Interaktiv, whose stated goal is to establish Islam as a “comprehensive way of life” in Germany, is a successor of Hizb ut-Tahrir, a global pan-Arab and pan-Islamic group that seeks to establish an Islamic caliphate. Although Hizb ut-Tahrir has been banned in Germany since January 2003, the government continues to turn a blind eye to Muslim Interaktiv, which was established in 2020 and opposes Western liberal democracy, women’s rights, and the state of Israel. Muslim Interaktiv has successfully filled a vacuum created after the destruction of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (ISIS) in 2019.
The leader
of Muslim Interaktiv is a charismatic 25-year-old Ghanaian-German convert
to Islam named Joe Adade Boateng (he now goes by Raheem) who is studying at the
University of Hamburg to become a teacher. He is adept at using social media
and digital networking to propagate victim narratives, a strategy that has made
him a superstar within the Islamist subculture.
In its
latest annual report, Hamburg’s state-security agency
warned that Muslim Interaktiv was leveraging social media to find new recruits
from among Germany’s disaffected Muslim youth. The group’s leaders have been described by security experts as “radical pop Islamists” who “shun beards, drive flashy cars, and hate Israel” and produce
professional-looking videos that “appeal to young people via the internet.”
Hamburg’s spy chief, Torsten Voß, said that Muslim Interaktiv is
“dangerous” because of its capacity to “increase the number of Islamists in the
long term.”
An Increasing Base of Support
Muslim Interaktiv and associated groups have mobilized large numbers of followers at public gatherings across Germany. In March 2024, hundreds of Salafists gathered in Hamburg to listen to a speech by Marcel Krass, an influential convert to Islam who, according to German intelligence, had contact with one of the terrorist hijackers in the 9/11 attacks.
In February 2023, Muslim Interaktiv mobilized 3,500 people in Hamburg to rally against Koran burnings in Sweden. In October 2023, the group organized a pro-Palestinian protest during which hundreds of demonstrators carrying Islamist flags attacked police officers with bottles and stones. And in November 2023, more than 3,000 members of Generation Islam — which, like Muslim Interaktiv, is an offshoot of Hizb-ut Tahrir — participated in a virulently anti-Israel protest in Essen, where they called for the establishment of an Islamic caliphate in Germany
Muslim Interaktiv has a large pool of supporters among younger Muslims in Germany. A new report from the Lower Saxony Criminological Research Institute revealed that a majority of Muslim students (67.8 percent) agreed with the statement: “The rules of the Koran are more important to me than the laws in Germany.” Almost half (45.8 percent) believed that “an Islamic theocracy is the best form of government” and 51.5 percent agreed with the statement: “Only Islam is able to solve the problems of our time.”
Turkish-German
Islamism expert Eren Güvercin explained the seriousness of Germany’s
Islamist problem: “The vast majority of caliphate supporters are not refugees,
but German citizens. They are children and grandchildren of immigrants,
including those who the German state once ‘recruited’ as cheap labor. They were
born in Germany, attended German schools, then German universities. They cannot
be deported. It is not just a failure of integration, but also of education.”
Tepid Responses
On May 4, a
group of moderate Muslims in Hamburg led by the chairman of the Kurdish
community in Germany, Ali Toprak, held a counterdemonstration to Muslim
Interaktiv to defend Germany’s liberal democratic constitutional order against
the encroachment of radical Islam. “The Islamists are babbling about the
caliphate and sharia,” he said. “We as a civil society shouldn’t
put up with that.” In the end, a few hundred people showed up.
One of
Germany’s leading experts on political Islam, Ahmad Mansour, lamented that “despite the seriousness” of
the challenge posed by Muslim Interaktiv, “only a
few are upset, while the majority of the country continues to ignore them.” He warned the “naïve West” against
“tolerating everything — even those forces that would threaten its way of life
— in the name of radical diversity and multiculturalism.”
But the mood in the country may now be changing. Germany’s main opposition party, the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), in a stark departure from the years when Angela Merkel ran it, has signaled that it intends to take a much harder line on Islam and migration. CDU general secretary Carsten Linnemann recently proposed changes to the party platform that would specify that “Sharia does not belong to Germany” and “Everyone who wants to live here must recognize our guiding culture [Leitkultur] without any ifs or buts.”
The CDU is
now calling on the federal government to ban
Muslim Interaktiv for engaging in anti-constitutional activities. “It is
unacceptable that Muslim Interaktiv is openly agitating on our streets against
Jews and against our free way of life,” said Hamburg’s CDU leader, Dennis
Thering. “We are governed by the Basic Law [Germany’s constitution] and not Sharia
Law.
Og denne,
om den fantasiverden ICJ og dens anklager – som dikterer sin egen autoritet og
legitimitet - lever i:
By Noah Rothman, May 20, 2024 12:26 PM
The ICC is under the mistaken impression that it enjoys legitimate jurisdiction over the conduct of Israel’s defensive war against Hamas.
… the ICC’s most recent missives read like dispatches
… On
Monday, ICC prosecutor Karim Khan announced his
office’s intention to
seek warrants for
the arrest of both Hamas’s leadership and members of Israel’s governing
coalition. The — we might call it aspirational — document begins fancifully
enough with the claim that it is a response to “the Situation in the State of
Palestine.”
That
language is good news for critics of the ICC insofar as there is no legal
entity that goes by that name. Nor is there such a thing as the “territory of
Israel,” which is how the ICC refers to the Jewish state (though some in the
ICC’s ranks surely believe granting Israel its name represents a gracious
dispensation to “the Zionist entity”). Those who understand that the ICC’s
jurisdiction is an imaginary construct likely find it unsurprising to see the
institution steadfastly refusing to commit to our shared experience in the real
world.
… But the
ICC frames Israel’s war against Hamas not as a response to the 10/7 massacre
but as a continuation of the “international armed conflict between Israel and
Palestine.” And if Hamas’s crimes are egregious, Israel’s are worse.
… The
inclusion of Gallant on the list of offenders establishes the veracity of an
assumption long held by Israel’s defenders: that foreign officials who are
hostile toward the exercise of Israel’s right to self-defense object not to the
Netanyahu government but to the Israeli political consensus around the need to
neutralize Hamas as the governing entity in Gaza.
… As German
legal scholar Michael Boothe, one of the world’s foremost experts on
international humanitarian law, observed, cutting off electricity — a commodity
with as much use to a hostile armed force as to civilians — to a wartime
adversary is accepted practice according to the International Committee of the
Red Cross. “Indeed, it would be paradoxical to say that a state is permitted to
destroy the enemy’s electric plants, but is required to supply its own
electricity to the enemy,” he wrote.
Moreover,
the ICC does not allege that Israel cut off all humanitarian assistance
to Gaza, because it did no such thing. … To date, the Israeli government maintains that nearly 550,000 tons of aid
have been introduced into Gaza since the onset of the war. If this is evidence
of genocidal intentions, Israel’s commitment to that course is half-hearted.
This is what the Israeli government gets for playing the U.N.’s game on its terms. Despite its opposition to the ICC and the International Court of Justice, Israel dispatched representatives to the Hague earlier this year to defend itself against allegations of genocide. … the ICJ determined that Israel was acting “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.” The allegations are not credible, …
The U.N.’s judicial bodies are deaf to all this. Ensconced in their own echo chamber, they exist in a parallel dimension in which they enjoy legitimate jurisdiction over the conduct of Israel’s defensive war. In reality, however,
the righteousness of the conduct of Israel’s war will be adjudicated by Israelis alone. The consequences its leaders face for their preservation of Israeli security both before and after the 10/7 attack are the province of Israelis alone. And the justice Hamas’s leaders deserve will be meted out by Israel alone.
We are under no special obligation to observe the contours of the alternate reality in which the United Nations’ bureaucrats choose to reside. Indeed, their solipsism only makes them easier to ignore.
Og denne:
https://www.jns.org/the-iccs-war-crimes/
Caroline Glick: The ICC’s war crimes
If
permitted to proceed unpunished for its actions on the global stage, the court
will gain in power and stature. (May 22, 2024 / JNS).
… This is a political, biased decision. It is a disgrace and a shame. We will continue on until victory.”
Netanyahu’s response was correct but too narrow. True, Khan’s accusation that Israel under Netanyahu and Israel Defense Minister Yoav Gallant is deliberately starving Gazans and intentionally targeting civilians for death is a blood libel. …
The
ICC’s goal in propagating this slander against the Jewish state is to
criminalize the State of Israel and pave the way for its annihilation by
denying it the right to self-defense.
While it’s true that Khan’s move is a shameful, nakedly political disgrace, it is also illegal. The ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel. Israel is not a signatory of the Rome Treaty, which founded the ICC, and set out its powers and jurisdiction. To get around that fact, the ICC illegally accepted “Palestine” as a signatory to the treaty.
The
political entity that presents itself as the “Government of Palestine” is the
Palestinian Authority. The P.A. was established in 1994 by force of the
bilateral agreements the Palestine Liberation Organization signed with Israel
during the 1990s. Those agreements—popularly known as the “Oslo agreements”—bar
the P.A. from seeking membership as a sovereign state in international bodies,
including the ICC.
(Related Articles:
Germany: We will execute ICC warrant against NetanyahuMay 23, 2024
Netanyahu slams ‘outrageous’ claims by ICC prosecutorMay 21, 2024
Gallant: ICC arrest warrant request must be ‘rejected explicitly’May 21, 2024).
The
ICC’s lack of jurisdiction is only part of the legal problem with its move
against Israel. In his statement on Monday, Khan drew a false moral equivalence
between the crimes against humanity and acts of genocide Hamas committed on
Oct. 7—meaning, the terror group’s invasion of Israel and slaughter, rape,
torture and abduction of thousands of civilians and soldiers on the one hand,
and the lawful acts of war that Israel has conducted against the Hamas
terrorist regime and its terror army in response to that invasion and
commission of atrocities.
Hamas is bound by its charter to commit genocide against the Jewish people worldwide and to annihilate the Jewish state. Khan’s allegations against Netanyahu and Gallant—and against the State of Israel more broadly—are predicated on blood libels originating from the Hamas regime in Gaza. In so acting, the ICC is providing material support for Hamas. …
A threat to the free world
First, the
United States should indict Hamas’s terror masters, including senior leaders
Yahya Sinwar, Mohamed Deif, Ismail Haniyeh, and other top Hamas terrorists for
the murder, rape, kidnapping and torture of U.S. citizens on and since Oct. 7. …
they should be held criminally liable by real courts,
as opposed to the ICC’s kangaroo court, …
Second, Khan and his associates should be charged with extortion of U.S. elected officials. Following the news late last month that Khan intended to pursue false charges against Israel’s leaders, several American lawmakers announced their intention to advance legislation sanctioning ICC officials. In response to those announcements, on May 3, the ICC issued a statement that Khan posted on his X account, threatening action against anyone acting against them.
The statement claimed that “threats” of action against the ICC and its personnel “may … constitute an offense against the administration of justice under Art.70 of the Rome Statute.”
… As
Netanyahu explained, the ICC’s move against Israel won’t daunt him as he leads
the country in this difficult war for national survival. But actions taken
against Israel by the ICC and similarly corrupt
international bodies form noxious precedents that can be used in the
future against free nations fighting genocidal terror armies and regimes.
If permitted to proceed unpunished for its crimes, the ICC will gain in power
and stature. And just as it is using its power against the lone Jewish state
today, so it will use it against the United States tomorrow.
Og så, ikke minst: Senter mot antisemittisme: Politiske konsekvenser av den politiske kampen mot Israel
Det lå ingen overraskelse i Regjeringen Støres vedtak om å tone flagg i den diplomatiske krigen mot Israel. Vedtaket om å «anerkjenne staten Palestina» var forberedt nasjonalt og samordnet internasjonalt blant den jødiske statens mest uttalte fiender i Europa. Initiativet til å presse frem dette vedtaket fra norsk side ble fremmet for Stortinget av kommunistpartiet Rødt allerede i fjor, og støtten fra flertallet i Stortinget var sikret på forhånd fra alle de venstreorienterte partiene. Også Høyre slutter seg til kommunistenes argumenter, selv om de er usikre på om tidspunktet er det rette. Så vet vi det.
Den politiske pogromen mot Israel som norske myndigheter nå har iverksatt vil få en rekke konsekvenser. Ingen av dem vil bidra til fred og forsoning mellom Israel og dets naboer, men noen vil kunne bidra til å klargjøre Israels forhold til enkelte vestlige land, deriblant Norge. At også Norge nå er ute av bildet som «fredspartner,» oppfattes i Israel som en lettelse. Måten det skjedde på var uverdig.
Den «tostatsløsningen» norske myndigheter forfekter, har ingen forankring i Midtøstens politiske realiteter. Den fredsprosessen Norge deltok i som tilrettelegger for 30 år siden eksisterer ikke lenger og årsaken til det har ingenting med «okkupasjon» eller «bosettinger» å gjøre. Oslo-avtalene og Oslo-prosessen dreide seg ikke om en tostatsløsning, noe enhver kan konstatere ved å lese avtalene. Forhandlingene og avtalene dreiet seg om å skape lokalt selvstyre for den arabiske befolkningsgruppen i landet. Det er ingen krav i folkeretten om at nasjonal selvbestemmelse forutsetter statsdannelse.
Tostatsløsningen er en idé som ble fremmet av den daværende saudi-arabiske kronprins Abdullah i hans «fredsplan» fra 2002, hvor han lovet å «anerkjenne» Israel dersom landet ville overlate til PLO de territoriene Israel frigjorde fra jordansk og egyptisk okkupasjon i juni 1967. I realiteten innebærer denne «fredsplanen» kun en løsning på arabernes emosjonelle problem med at de i 1967 mislyktes i sitt forsøk på å ødelegge Israel. For Israel ville denne «løsningen» føre landet tilbake til det eksistensielle trusselbildet landet sto overfor i de 19 årene deler av landet var okkupert av Jordan og Egypt. Det er ikke et bærekraftig alternativ for Israel at Judea, Samaria, Øst-Jerusalem og Gaza i stedet blir okkupert av Hamas eller PLO.
For det er dette som er essensen i det norske tverrpolitiske kravet om en tostatsløsning. Statsminister Støre beskriver den norske anerkjennelsen av staten Palestina ved å presisere at «den territorielle avgrensingen mellom staten Palestina og staten Israel bør basere seg på grensene fra før 4. juni 1967 med Jerusalem som delt hovedstad.»
Det noen kanskje har glemt å fortelle statsministeren, er at den 4. juni 1967 var Israel det eneste landet i verden som ikke hadde grenser. På det tidspunktet var landet omgitt av våpenhvilelinjer fra en krig i 1948-49 som ennå ikke var avsluttet med freds- og grensetraktater. De midlertidige våpenhvileavtalene slår klart fast at de ikke kan påberopes som statsgrenser. Og ingen var mer opptatt av å understreke dette enn de omkringliggende araberstatene. I dag er Israels statsgrense mot Jordan og Egypt fastlagt gjennom internasjonalt anerkjente freds- og grensetraktater, noe den norske regjeringen helt overser.
Angripernes standpunkt etter at de ble slått under Seksdagerskrigen var vedtaket deres i Khartoum hvor de formulerte sine tre nei til fred med Israel. Dette vedtaket er fremdeles gjeldende arabisk rett. Tilbudet om «fred» dersom Israel kapitulerer i stedet for å forsvare seg, er i arabisk tankesett et tilbud om å akseptere islamsk dhimmi-status, – dvs. som «beskyttet» og underdanig skattebetalende trell. Israel har ikke behov for å akseptere noe slikt dersom det er dette som menes med «normalisering.»
At man fra norsk side ikke forstår islamsk kultur kan ikke bare skyldes uvitenhet om politiske og religiøse realiteter i Midtøsten.
Kommentar: Se hva jeg skrev om tidligere forsvarsjef Diesen her:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/barth-eide-det-perfekte-tidspunkt.html
Ta denne: Danmarks
ambassadør i Israel, Jesper Vahr, sagde det direkte i en TV-debat, som fandt
sted på Jerusalem Posts redaktion nogle uger før julen 2014, og udsendt på
avisens net-tv. Han udtrykte det på den måde, at israelerne jo er “lige som
os”, og derfor havde særlige moralske forpligtelser. Han blev mødt med rasende
protester fra de øvrige deltagere, og ikke mindst fra den amerikansk/isralelske
redaktør på Jerusalem Post, Caroline Glick. (Etter Knud Skjærgård, 2012).
Og så har vi alle dem som i sin forvirring – for ikke å si i sin iboende ondskap – sier at de elsker jøder samtidig som de vil knuse staten Israel – forstå det den som vil.
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2011/02/er-gaarder-antisemitt.html
SMS fortsatt:
Det norske vedtaket – sammen med det politiske initiativet til å fatte vedtaket akkurat nå – har alle kjennetegn på å være gjort i full bevissthet om de katastrofale følgene det vil få for Israel om de skulle etterfølge det norske kravet. Dette styrkes også av det faktum at vedtaket var samordnet med tilsvarende vedtak fra to andre av Europas mest antisemittiske regimer, i Irland og Spania. Dette er land som, i likhet med Norge, har pleiet tette kontakter med terror-organisasjonen Hamas i mange år.
Myndighetene burde dessuten ha satt spørsmålstegn ved Egypts rolle i forsøket fra Hamas på å ødelegge Israel. Kravet fra det internasjonale samfunn om ikke å gå inn i grensebyen Rafah for å uskadeliggjøre Hamas, må også ses i lys av den avsløringen israelske militære nå har gjort av et 50-talls smuglertuneller under grensen mot Egypt, som Hamas med arabisk og vestlig finansiering har brukt til å importere enorme mengder våpen og ammunisjon av alle slag. Dette enorme transportsystemet har Egypts ledelse vært fullstendig klar over, og det er ikke usannsynlig at også USAs etterretning har sittet med slik informasjon, noe som kan bidra til å forklare den hysteriske frykten for at Israel skulle gå inn og rydde opp i Rafah. Nå har Israel flyttet vekk mer enn en million mennesker fra Rafah og er fast bestemt på å fullføre oppryddingen også der. Både Israels og arabernes eksistens er avhengig av at dette gjøres.
Vi forstår både Biden-administrasjonens og regjeringen Støres forsøk på å lette sin egen kommende valgkamp ved å gi politiske konsesjoner til sin egen politiske venstreside. Det tragiske i dette tilfellet er at de velger en århundregammel taktikk ved å ofre jødene for å vinne oppslutning om seg selv. Pogromer mot jødene som politisk verktøy for å lede oppmerksomhet bort fra egne feil og mangler er ikke bare historie. Det foregår hver dag i norske medier og politiske fora. Denne gangen har imidlertid politikerne forregnet seg. Jødene lar seg ikke lenger undertrykke og herje med for å tilfredsstille ubehjelpelige og mislykkede politikere.
Den tabben de norske politikerne nå har gjort vil måtte komme til å koste noe. Norge er ikke lenger en fredspartner når man krever at jødene skal belønne og underkaste seg viljen til brutale terrorister. De alternative «palestinerne» som utenriksministeren påstår skal være fredselskende motstandere av Hamas, eksisterer bare i hans egen fantasi. Et overveldende flertall av arabere både i Gaza og i Judea og Samaria er tragisk nok tilhengere av Hamas. Det kan ta svært lang tid til å endre dette slik at jøder og arabere en gang kan leve side om side i fred og sikkerhet. Det norske vedtaket har forlenget den tiden det vil ta.
https://sma-norge.no/politiske-konsekvenser-av-den-politiske-kampen-mot-israel/
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar