https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2023/10/sannheten-fom-forlot-gaza-en-samling.html
Det er alltid tusenvis av spørsmål å stille i denne «saken»
og alltid tusener av svar som alle ligger i «tusen bitar». I hvert fall til
tider. Folk og materie endrer seg. Vi skal gi vårt lille bidrag, i det håp at i
hvert fall noe kan bli klarere for den som leser. Se liste over hyperrelevante
spørsmål og svar nederst på siden, hentet fra Wikipedia.
Som kjent støtter mange karismatikere Israel i tykt og tynt. Begrunnelsen henter de fra Det gamle testamentet, akkurat som de radikale jødene i Israel gjør. De bygger på landløfter og andre løfter gitt dem av JHWH og som forutsettes å være evig gjeldende løfter. Men som kristne, må ikke disse karismatikerne da ut fra Skriftene mene at disse løftene ikke gjelder lenger, i kraft av Kristi ene offer (en gang for alle) på korset, et faktum som umuliggjør videre ofringer i et eventuelt nytt tempel i Jerusalem?
Dette er visst spørsmål karismatikerne ofte ikke har noe entydig eller klart svar på, annet enn som at man henviser til Bibelen – sui generis, Skriften – hele Skriften - er sin egen fortolker - og at man svarer ut fra hva Bibelen selv sier, og slik de selv tolker dette. Man finner ikke noe behov for en mer systematisk teologi fra karismatikernes side; de kan derfor risikere. i hvert fall hypotetisk- å støtte Israel i ett og alt, uansett etisk uakseptable nyanser. Man havner i det jeg vil kalles kronisk karismatisk-bibelsk spagat.
Se om f eks karismatikeren Hanvold her:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/09/hanvold-og-morken-en-nifs-samlet.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/03/okkupasjonen-lovlig-og-ikke-ulovlig.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/gaza-hva-som-star-pa-spill-om-en.html
Litt historikk:
Dagen – etter drapet på Rabin i 1995 – var Simon Peres
stats- og forsvarsminister: Han proklamerte at han ville handle etter det som
sto ham nærmest: Fred. (Se hva Bennett sier om «fred» under).
Se denne «nydelige» beskrivelsen av Hamas som vi finner i O K Tveits bok, også omtalt:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/08/o-k-tveit-norge-en-forrdernasjon.html (se sitat litt under).
Og her:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/09/kan-hamas-moderniseres-kan-islam-hva.html
Et mellomstadium her, før vi går videre under:
The moral cowardice of European Christian leaders; The
pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury are accused of abandoning the defense of
the Bible:
“The world is locked in a civilizational battle of values,
threatened by terrorism and violent jihad,” said Goldstein. “At a time when
Europe’s very future hangs in the balance, its two most senior Christian
leaders have abandoned their most sacred duty to protect and defend the values
of the Bible. Their cowardice and lack of moral clarity threaten the free
world.”
In January 2024, a report for Genocide Watch confirmed that, since 2000, 62,000 Christians in Nigeria have been murdered by Islamist groups in an ongoing attempt to exterminate Christianity. In addition, more than 32,000 moderate black Nigerian Muslims and non-faith individuals have been massacred.
According to a report in 2020 by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, Christians in Myanmar, China, Eritrea, India, Iran, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Vietnam are being persecuted.
These facts were reported in June by Peter Baum for The
Daily Blitz. Yet the mainstream media all but ignore these atrocities.
There are no marches in Western cities to accuse these countries of
facilitating crimes against humanity. There are no NGO-inspired petitions to
the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to declare these countries and groups
guilty of genocide.
Last month, Welby endorsed the advisory opinion of the ICJ
that Israel’s occupation of the “Palestinian territories” was illegal. The
court’s opinion, which owed everything to politics and virtually nothing to
law, was based entirely on lies and distortions.
Back in 2020, Welby said he was ashamed of the Anglican
attitude towards black people and declared that the church was “deeply,
institutionally racist.” The pope, an acolyte of left-wing “liberation
theology,” has a similarly anti-West mindset.
https://www.jns.org/the-moral-cowardice-of-european-christian-leaders/
https://jihadwatch.org/2024/09/betrayal
http://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2023/06/selvdestruktiv-eufori-over-hele-europa.html
http://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2022/08/alle-ser-men-fa-vil-forsta-nar-skal-det.html
http://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2022/08/tidsbilde-og-terror-de-vil-ikke-tro-det.html
Og:
Pope Francis gave new meaning to the old term “Catholic guilt” on Wednesday when he said that refusing to aid the multitudes of migrants who are streaming into Europe was a “grave sin.” Refusing to become an open-borders globalist leftist takes its place among pride (well, that one is borderline these days, too), anger, lust, sloth, and the rest.
Will Catholics who fought in earlier ages to preserve the cultural and spiritual heritage of Europe now get sentenced to hell retroactively for not opening their doors to the invaders? About that, the pontiff was mum, but if you don’t favor mass migration into the West now, you’re treading on dangerous ground as far as the Roman Catholic Church is concerned.
Reuters reported that Pope Francis on Wednesday “strongly decried the treatment of migrants crossing the Mediterranean Sea to enter Europe.” The pope lamented, “There are those who work systematically and with every means to reject migrants. And this, when done with conscience and responsibility, is a grave sin.” The solution to this evil, he said, would be “global governance of migration based on justice, brotherhood and solidarity.” Yeah, that would fix everything.
https://jihadwatch.org/2024/08/pope-francis-to-the-west-drop-dead
Sørgelig aktuelt, for å si det sånn, for så vidt:
Hen, han, hun og homo: Alle ønskes velkommen av Stavanger bispedømme
Erling Marthinsen 06.09.2024 12:25
Stavanger-biskop Anne Lise Ådnøy var fornøyd med Kirkemøtets vedtak i august 2023 om at jobbsøkere til Den norske kirke ikke lenger kan bli spurt om samliv. Arkivfoto: Carina Johansen / NTB
Aldri før har homofile blitt oppfordret til å søke jobber i Stavanger bispedømme. Men nå er tonen endret, og alle, uansett legning, ønskes velkommen til å søke på ledige stillinger.
Litt spesialteologi, kan man vel si, for de ydderst lærevillige:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/treenigheten-dens-utrolige-letthet-i.html
Om endetiden i ulike bibelske perspektiver og venstresiden som den nye erstatningsteologien:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/01/venstresidens-nye-ateistiske.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/02/islam-befester-seg-na-over-hele-verden.html
Men først nå, kanskje det minst viktige:
“Israel has a right to defend itself,” Kamala told CNN.
And then insisted that the “war must end.”, Kamala Harris. https://www.jns.org/israel-has-the-right-to-win/
Med henblikk på «Nei til islam»:
… “Alexander the Great remarked that the people of Asia were slaves because they had not learned to pronounce the word ‘No,’” Churchill reminded Americans.
“No” has become a forbidden word to the people of the formerly free world.
When Churchill’s Englishmen tried to say “No” to PM Keir Starmer, they were locked up. The world watched as their homes were broken into in televised raids.
When Canadian truckers tried to say “No” to PM Justin Trudeau, he declared martial law.
And when Americans tried to say “No” to Biden-Harris, they were sentenced to years in prison.
An iron curtain is descending on us. It tricks us, lies to us, manipulates us, gaslights us, propagandizes at us, and when that fails, it outlaws us, censors us and it imprisons us because those who would make us into slaves in their utopia fear one word above all else.
“No,” a word that shattered the original iron curtain can shatter this new one too.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/an-iron-curtain-is-descending-on-us/
Som
nevnt over, beskriver O K Tveit Hamas slik:
Hamas var ikke lenger fiksert på «alt eller ingenting» når det gjaldt Israel. Partiets ledere var ikke ensporet, det visste også Israels ledende islamisteksperter. Hamas hadde gang på gang demonstrert at partiet justerte seg ved skiftende politiske omstendigheter. Ledelsen hadde flere ganger søkt om å få til langvarige våpenhviler med Israel. Men israelerne takket nei. Det kunne virke som om de ønsket å ha Hamas som nyttige fiender.
I desember lovet Hamas å stanse angrep mot sivile i
Israel, og at ingen skulle angripe okkupantene fra områder under palestinsk
selvstyre. Hamas ga opp kravet om at Oslo I-avtalen måtte kanselleres, men
lederne ville ikke forplikte seg til å akseptere avtalen, fordi de mente den
såkalte fredsprosessen ville feile og være over innen ti år. s 184 i Tveit,
2023.
Kommentar: Man skulle tro at Tveit beskriver Hamas og dermed
islam’s essen. Men i så fall, er det ønsketenknng og ren retorisk propaganda –
mot jøder og Israel.
S 113 ff, (ibid): Peres hadde gitt ordre til å drepe Ayyash,
fordi han var hjernen bak en rekke palestinske kamikazeaksjoner på Vestbredden
og i Israel. Bombeangrepene mot sivile israelere var alle hevnaksjoner for de
29 ofrene i Hebron-massakren i 1994. Statsminister Peres var vel vitende at det
å drepe Ayyas ville føre til ytterligere hevn fra Hamas med nye drap på
sivile israelere. For Peres var det viktigere å vise handlekraft i form
av utenomrettslige henrettelser enn å skape fred og forsoning … s 185.
Rabin angret til sin siste dag at han hadde gitt etter for Gush Eminim, s 115. I 1974 støttet Peres settlernes krav om å slå seg ned hvor som helst i «Israels land», også alle okkuperte områder. S 109. Han var skråsikker på at Egypt ikke ville angripe Israel, til tross for president Nassers krigerske språk og stengning av Tiranasteredet … s 78.
Etter avisoppslaget om drapene av krigsfangene, ba Egypt om at Israel måtte etterforske forbrytelsene … først førti år etter innrømmet brigader Arye Biro at han hadde vært med på å drepe 49 egyptiske fanger mens de satt bundet i et steinbrudd … (her vises det til massakre som ble holdt skjult for publikum). S 69.
Sekulære israelske politikere spilte fremtredende roller i
den aggressive alliansen som presset på for å bygge eksklusive kolonier for
jøder … dette landet hadde alltid vært en del av jødisk liv. Men de hevdet ikke
at det var Guds vilje at jødene skulle returnere til det bibelske Israel for å
vente på Messias gjenkomst på Dommens dag …
S 99: Mange jøder og kristensionister hevder at da Gud ga
landet til Abrahams etterfølgere, fikk jødene rett til å styre og bygge ut det
bibelske Palestina. I første Mos. 15. 18 står det: Den dagen suttet Herren en
pakt med Abraham og sa: Din ætt gir jeg dette landet, fra Egypterelven helt til
Storelven, Eufrat … men ledende teologer sier at Gud ikke kan brukes til å
sette folkeretten til side, eller til å undertrykke eller forvise andre folk.
De sier det strider mot alt Bibelen sier om menneskeverd, fred og
rettferdighet. Enhver historiker vet også at erobringer eller
folkeforflytninger har funnet sted overalt i verden, men det gir ikke nykommere
rett til å si at de er opprinnelige innbyggere som kan kreve forvisning av dem
som nå bor der … (Tveit viser til Jerom Slater her, Mythologies Without
End … 1917-2020).
Kolonien Ofra, ved hovedveien mellom Jerusalem og Nablus, var en av de ulovlige koloniene som ble etablert ved hjelp av løgner og triks. Settlerne kunne takke forsvarsminister Shimon Peres for hjelpen. I all hemmelighet hadde han gått bak statsminister Yizhak Rabins rygg for å hjelpe dem … historien startet da ekstremister fra Gush Emunim – Blokken av de trofaste – i april 1975 tok over brakkene i en tidligere jordansk militærbase.
Statsminister Rabin likte hverken opposisjonspolitikerne
eller settlerbevegelsen. Han gikk utenom forsvarsminister Peres … s 109.
Fra Ramon Bennett kan vi lese følgende:
Rabin prepared the nation for a retreat from from the Golan by saying: «whoever is not prepared to make peace with Syria could expect a war within five to eight years». Yes, fear is a major factor in the Rabin-Peres rush to placate their most deadly of enemies – fear that Israel might not survive in the age of technological warfare», s 219 i Philistine.
I The Wall, s 274: Bennet viser til Ezekiel 47. 13-21, vers 10: Fordi, fordi de har forført Mitt folk, og sagt «Fred!» der det ikke er noen fred … The «prophets of Peace» have led Yahwe’s preople astray
-have seduced them» … de har forledet dem til å bli
illojale …
Bennett refererer til mange uttalelser mot jødene og Israel, begge som sådanne:
… Det er vår plikt å bekjempe jødene «for the sake of Allah and religion», det er vår plikt å fullføre det som Muhammed begynte, (nov 1955).
Sadat: Jeg lover å knuse Israel og underlegge det til den ydmykelse og fordervelse som etableres i Koranen, 1971,
Arafat: Visselig, Allah har en dom for jødene inntil Palestina blir transformert fra Dar al-Harb til Dar al-Islam.
Al-Banna: Israel vil eksistere helt til islam eliminerer det, akkurat på samme måte som islam eliminerte det som var før islam, 1991.
Ibn Gand: Vi godtar krig – jihad – den hellige krig …
Farouk av Egypt: Jødene i Palestina må bli eliminerte. Det fins intet annet valg for oss som tilber Allah’s navn. Det vil bare bli jihad.
Kongen av Libya: Sionistenes erobring av Palestina er en fornærmelse for alle muslimer. Det kan ikke bli noen kompromisser før alle jøder er døde og borte.
Husseini, 1946: Allah har pålagt oss det sjeldne privilegium å fullføre det som Hitler begynte. La jihad begynne. Myrd jødene. Drep dem alle.
M Sheik 1973: Guds fiender har gått til angrep på muslimsk land og vanhelliget våre helligdommer. Det er blitt en plikt for alle muslimer å erlegge det offer det er å frigjøre de muslimske territoriene …
Bin Laden, 1973: Å bekjempe jødene og Israel er en religiøs forpliktelse og en guddommelig plikt …
Rafsanjani, 1991: Alle problemer i våre land kan tilbakeføres til ett eneste dilemma: Jødenes okkupasjonen av Dar al-Islam.
Fra kristent hold finner vi dette:
Apostelen Paulus sluttet umiddelbart med å forfølge dem som trodde på Kristus, se Gl 1. 17.
Nøkkelen til denne teksten er ordet «iver», zelotes, … det hører hjemme i en militant teologisk tradisjon og handler om en voldelig og teologisk motivert reaksjon rettet mot dem i eget folk som opptrer på en måte som krenker Guds status, og dermed også Guds ære. Israels statsminister Y Rabin ble myrdet i 1995. Morderen var jøde og motiverte senere sin handling med tradisjonen om Pinhas, slik vi finner det i 4 Mose 25. 1-13. … da han så en israelitt og en midjannitisk kvinne gå inn i et telt sammen, ble han grepet v brennende iver (zelos) og drepte begge … på Guds vegne … og dette ble senere fremholdt som «sann nidkjærhet» for Gud. … Pinhas forbilde viser til 1 Makkabeerbok og opprøret mot syrekongen Antiokos …
Paulus viser til at Kristus blir nøkkelen til en rett
forståelse av loven … s 101f i Karl Olav Sandnes: Var Paulus kristen? 2011.
Det kan spørres om Paulus i alle forhold tenkte på Israel som det konkrete landet Palestina (den gang, og for alltid bundet til landområdet), eller om han tenkte seg Israel som et folk på evig flyttefot, så å si. Var med andre ord Paulus erstatningsteolog?
Mange teologer synes å mene dette. Mange jøder i Israel i dag mener at løftene i GT gjelder bokstavelig også i dag, de er gitt forbeholdsløst av Gud (JHWH).
Som vi ser i denne posteringen, fins det også mange sekulære
jøder, f eks Rabin og Peres m fl. Netanyahu synes å være mer politisk
retter i alt han foretar seg, men at han har eller har hatt kontakt med kristne
sionister, kan jo dokumenteres, men uten at man kan trekke noen endegyldig
konklusjoner om relevans for vårt anliggende her.
Et apropos: Ordet og begrepet Israel er nevnt i Koranen og dette i seg selv må vel innebære en slags aksept og anerkjennelse fra Allah og profetens side og som et visst fingerpek mot muslimer f eks i Hamas som vil ikke bare tilintetgjøre Israel, men også jødene …. selv om dette fingerpeket eller forbeholdet i Koranen neppe er noe islamske lærde i dag vil underskrive på, (hvilket jo skulle tyde på at Koranen er inkonsistent hva gjelder Israel og jødene. Inkonsistens går for øvrig fint for riktig fromme muslimer som heller holder seg til Allah’s vilje enn menneskets fornuft (se andre steder her på bloggen).
Bare tull og babbel? Vel, se disse:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/hanvold-ragnhiild-og-gril-underdanige.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/01/venstresidens-nye-ateistiske.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/jan-hanvol-er-jde-og-erstatningsteolog.html
Om frykt, «trøst», endetid, opprykkelse, kristensionister og Israel:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/frykt-og-redsel-for-endetid-og.html
Angrep DnK Israel eller bare kristensionistene?
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2020/12/angrep-bispene-kristensionister-eller.html
Domstolen i Haag:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/nrk-og-domstolen-i-haag-like-begredelige.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/vil-hamas-og-terror-ta-over-hele.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/05/treenigheten-dens-utrolige-letthet-i.html
Det er alltid mulig å tilegne seg større perspektiver på alt dette, for ikke si "det største perspektivet»:
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/islam-vil-vil-ikke-hverken-seire-eller.html
https://neitilislam.blogspot.com/2024/04/hvorfor-islam-vil-seire-eller-vi-tape.html
Religiøst motivert vold, fundert i Allah?: Se disse:
Haniyeh has been more popular among Palestinians than PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. Polls have repeatedly shown that were elections held now, Palestinians would elect Haniyeh as president over Abbas. In June this year—eight months after Hamas’ Oct. 7 massacre in Israel, a poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) showed that 46% of Palestinians would vote for Ismail Haniyeh. In contrast, Mahmoud Abbas would receive as little as 5% of the votes.
The following are representative statements exposed by Palestinian Media Watch showing Haniyeh’s
ideology, beliefs, and policies:
Ismail Haniyeh:
- “We love death like our enemies love life!”
- “We need the blood of the children, women, and elderly” to “ignite within us the spirit of revolution”
- “Armed resistance is path, Palestine is from the sea to the river”
- “Hamas won’t recognize Israel… armed struggle is a strategic choice”
- “We will liberate West Bank and rest of Palestine just as we liberated Gaza – with Intifada”
Dette over er noe annet enn dette:
… Julie Dahle, HRS: Brorskapets metoder er Qatars kjennetegn. De bruker myk makt snarere enn militær makt, men tro for all del ikke at maktbruk handler om uselvisk ønske om verdensfred. Folk og forsvar definerer ideologisk makt som «makt over tanker, verdier og følelser og omtales ofte som «overtalelsens makt». Denne typen makt vil kunne påvirke andre stater uten å bruke verken økonomisk eller militær makt. Noen stater er rollemodeller for andre, for eksempel når det kommer til kultur eller politisk styreform. Det betyr at de er bærere av verdier eller normer som andre stater ønsker å følge eller etterligne. Diplomatiet er det klassiske eksemplet på ideologisk makt. Her møtes stater til samtaler, for eksempel fredsforhandlinger, for å løse ulike utfordringer.»
Den myke makten sees ikke bare i fredsforhandlinger, men i investeringer.
https://www.rights.no/2024/09/den-norske-florten-med-qatar/
-
In December 1987, the Brotherhood adopted a more nationalist and activist line under the name of Hamas. Hamas was initially discretely supported by Israel as a counter-balance to the secular PLO. During the 1990s and early 2000s, the organization conducted numerous suicide bombings and other attacks against Israel.
How many times has Hamas attacked Israel?
Since 2007,
Israel and Hamas, along with other Palestinian militant groups based in Gaza,
have engaged in conflict, including in four wars in 2008–2009, 2012, 2014, and
2021. These conflicts killed approximately 6,400 Palestinians and 300 Israelis.
Since 2006, Hamas
and Israel have fought five wars, the most recent of which began in 2023
and is ongoing.
While the State
of Israel was established on 15 May 1948 and admitted to the United Nations, a
Palestinian State was not established. The remaining territories of
pre-1948 Palestine, the West Bank - including East Jerusalem- and Gaza Strip,
were administered from 1948 till 1967 by Jordan and Egypt, respectively.
HAMAS has been
the de facto governing body in the Gaza Strip since 2007, when it ousted the
Palestinian Authority from power.
Se gjerne følgende i håp om bli usikkert sikker og sikkert
usikker:
https://www.cfr.org/blog/hamas-and-two-state-solution
https://education.cfr.org/learn/timeline/israeli-palestinian-conflict-timeline
https://www.ajc.org/IsraelConflictTimeline
https://www.frontpagemag.com/hezbollah-still-cant-quite-grasp-what-the-idf-did-to-it/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/a-terrorist-organization-this-is-what-hamas-charters-say/
https://www.njohsp.gov/threat-landscape/foreign-terrorist-organizations/hamas
https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/hamas-charter/
https://forward.com/opinion/564190/hamas-charter-truth/
https://www.americanpurpose.com/articles/from-the-river-to-the-sea/
http://newhouse.house.gov/media/weekly-columns-and-op-eds/hamas-israel-will-exist-and-will-continue-exist-until-islam-will
(1.1 MB
https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/hamas-its-own-words
-
Viktige spørsmål for holde seg a-jour, svar funnet via google på Wikipedia:
The Palestine Liberation Organization has accepted the concept of a two-state solution since the 1982 Arab Summit. In 2017, Hamas announced their revised charter, which claims to accept the idea of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, but without recognising the statehood of Israel. Wikipedia.
Graham Usher
states that while Hamas does not consider Israel to be legitimate, it has
accepted Israel as political reality.
HAMAS emerged in
1987 during the first Palestinian uprising, or intifada, as an outgrowth of the
Muslim Brotherhood's Palestinian branch. The group is committed to armed
resistance against Israel and the creation of an Islamic Palestinian state in
Israel's place.
Does Russia recognize Palestine as a state?
Among the G20,
nine countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi
Arabia, South Africa, and Turkey, as well as permanent invitee Spain) have
recognized Palestine as a state, while ten countries (Australia, Canada,
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the
...
Which countries help Hamas?
Since the early
1990s, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been sponsoring the militant
organization Hamas with military aid and training and financial aid. Iran has
remained a key patron of Hamas, providing them with funds, weapons, and
training.
Does Ukraine recognize Palestine?
The Ukrainian
Soviet Socialist Republic recognized Palestinian independence on 19 November
1988. Palestine recognized Ukraine as a sovereign state in February 1992. On 2
November 2001, the two countries established diplomatic relations and the
Palestinian embassy opened the same day.
Does Hamas still control Palestine?
Hamas has
governed the Gaza Strip in Palestine since its takeover of the region from
rival party Fatah in June 2007.
Is Hamas funded by Israel?
Former Israeli
officials have openly acknowledged Israel's role in providing funding and
assistance to Hamas as a means of undermining secular Palestinian factions such
as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Why does Qatar support Hamas?
Sources say that
advocating for Hamas is politically beneficial to Turkey and Qatar because the
Palestinian cause draws popular support amongst their citizens at home.
Does Hamas want peace? Hamas and the Palestinian
Islamic Jihad.
Both groups reject the Oslo Accords and other plans for peace with Israel.
Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, the two groups worked together to derail the
peace process by attacking Israeli civilians. Hamas undertook a ceasefire with
Israel in August 2004.
What does the Quran say about Israel?
However, the
Qur'an specifies that the Land of Israel is the homeland of the Jewish
people, that God Himself gave that Land to them as heritage and ordered
them to live therein.
Does Turkey support Hamas?
Under the
conservative leader Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey has become a stalwart
supporter of the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip.
Unlike Israel, Turkey has never listed Hamas as a terrorist organistion.
Who funds Hezbollah?
Hezbollah says
that the main source of its income comes from its own investment portfolios and
donations by Muslims. Western sources maintain that Hezbollah receives most of
its financial, training, weapons, explosives, political, diplomatic, and
organizational aid from Iran and Syria.
Does China Recognise Hamas?
China does not
consider Hamas ruling the Gaza Strip as a terrorist organization, and
officially supports the creation of a "sovereign and independent
Palestinian state" based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its
capital.
Does Europe support Palestine?
Relations between
the European Union and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) were
established in 1975 as part of the Euro-Arab Dialogue. The EU is a member of
the Quartet and is the single largest donor of foreign aid to the Palestinian
Authority.
Does Fatah support Hamas?
The
semi-constitutional and semi-presidential Basic Law gave President and
Government a shared political power. Fatah refused to cooperate with Hamas. The
powerful Fatah-backed President Abbas was supported by the international
community and more or less tolerated by Israel.
Does Israel have a right to exist?
The legal and
territorial status of Israel and Palestine is still hotly disputed in the
region and within the international community. According to Ilan Pappé, Arab
recognition of Israel's right to exist was part of Folke Bernadotte's 1948
peace plan.
Who supports Hamas? Iranian support, primarily through its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), has enabled Hamas's and PIJ's terrorist activities, to include the transfer of hundreds of millions of dollars in financial assistance and the furnishing of both weapons and operational training.Nov 14, 2023
Does Al Jazeera support Hamas? Al Jazeera has also been accused of pushing Hamas propaganda, repeatedly broadcasting statements by Hamas' military and political leaders calling for a broader uprising and aligning themselves closely with Hamas' preferred language for the conflict.
Who funds Gaza? Since 2014, with Israel's approval despite the blockade, Qatar has provided aid to the Gaza Strip that has partially relieved some of the economic pressure on the Gaza Strip. Between 2014 and 2019, Qatar has provided over $1 billion in reconstruction funds and stipends for poor Palestinians.
Does Saudi Arabia support Palestine? History. While Saudi Arabia tends to be a sympathizer of Palestine after the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, Saudi Arabia has distanced itself from the conflict and emphasizes in a friendlier approach.
Does Hamas apply Sharia? Hamas also
continued to enforce restrictions on Gaza's population based on its
interpretation of Islam and sharia.
Will Palestine be free in Islam?
Dugin followed up
his statement on Palestine and Islam by saying: Will Palestine be free? That
depends on the global Islam. If you, our Muslim brethren, have still the
dignity and power, the faith and real deep trust in God, the Holy Land will be
liberated.
The Quran
makes 44 specific references to the Banū Isrāʾīl (the Children of Israel). although the term might refer to both
Jews and Christians as a single religious lineage. In the Quran (2:140), Jews
(Yahūdi) are considered a religious group, while Banū Isrāʾīl are an ethnic group.
Did God give Israel to the Jews?
The Torah
explicitly says that God gave Israel to the Jewish people. It is our birthright. The birth of the
modern state of Israel in 1948 is the fulfillment of this right.
Does Jordan support Israel or Palestine? Promoting peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is a major priority for Jordan. It supports U.S. efforts to mediate a final settlement, which it believes should be based on the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, proposed by Saudi Arabia.
Is Hamas official Palestine? HAMAS has been
the de facto governing body in the Gaza Strip since 2007, when it ousted the
Palestinian Authority from power. Primarily in Gaza; also maintains a presence
in the West Bank; Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon; and key regional
capitals, such as Doha, Qatar, and Cairo, Egypt.
Does the PLO support Hamas? Moreover, Hamas, the largest representative of the inhabitants of the Palestinian Territories alongside Fatah, is not represented in the PLO at all.
Has Palestine ever been a country? In 1988 the Palestine National Council meeting in Algiers proclaimed the establishment of the State of Palestine. Read more here and here. The Security Council demanded Israel withdraw its forces “forthwith and unconditionally” from Lebanon up to its internationally recognized boundaries.
Is Palestine a US ally? While the U.S.
does not recognize the State of Palestine, it recognizes the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO) as the legitimate representative entity for the
Palestinian people; following the Oslo Accords, it recognized the Palestinian
National Authority as the legitimate Palestinian government of the Palestinian
...
Is Hamas funded by Israel? Former Israeli
officials have openly acknowledged Israel's role in providing funding and
assistance to Hamas as a means of undermining secular Palestinian factions such
as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Who are the biggest donors to Palestine by country? Seventeen donors
have frozen their funding. In order of importance according to 2022
contributions: US, Germany, Sweden, Japan, Canada, Netherlands, UK, Italy,
Australia, Austria, Finland, New Zealand, Iceland, Romania, and three small
contributors: Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia.
Has Hamas ever broken a ceasefire? Even a lull initiated by Hamas was promptly violated by the terrorists themselves. Hamas also violated the 15 July ceasefire initiated by Egypt and supported by most of the international community, including the Arab League. Israel accepted this ceasefire.
Can non-Muslims go to heaven? Islam neither
claims that all non-Muslims will go to Hell nor does it say that everyone who calls
themselves a Muslim will necessarily enter Heaven. The decision of who goes to
Heaven or Hell is left entirely to God and is based on God's Grace and Mercy
rather than on our deeds alone.
Which countries help Palestine the most? Since 1993 the European Commission and the EU member-states combined have been by far the largest aid contributor to the Palestinians. Arab League states have also been substantial donors, notably through budgetary support of the PNA during the Second Intifada.
Who funds Hamas military? In addition to the funds Hamas receives from Iran, its global portfolio of investments generates vast sums of revenue through its assets, estimated to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars, with companies operating in Sudan, Algeria, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and other countries.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar